
Despite running a multi-million dollar deficit, Dearborn city leaders voted to purchase a new city hall.
With the city of Dearborn running a budget deficit that city officials have repeatedly said is upwards of $20 million, the decision this week by council and mayor to set aside nearly $4 million in taxpayer money to buy a new city hall has us shaking our head in disbelief.
For sure the building at 16901 Michigan Ave., which formerly housed the metro Detroit headquarters of payroll processor ADP Inc. and has been vacant since 2010, is a decent “deal” in a down real estate market. But a “good deal” shouldn’t be reason to spend when residents have been told we have money challenges.
Yes one can make the argument this purchase is for the long haul, but don’t think for a minute the new building won’t need major rework to accommodate city offices. This isn’t as simple as hanging a new city hall sign on Michigan Avenue.
City leaders know this, too, which is likely why no one was able to address the costs required to retrofit the ADP building to make it City Hall suitable. The city has set aside about $525,000 above the $3.2 million purchase price for the building. That won’t even begin to cover costs to get this building into shape.
Finance Director Jim O’Connor told the Dearborn Press & Guide that the money to cover the purchase of the building will come from either accumulated savings in the general fund, bonds, or an unspecified third source that he called “promising.”
We are told there’s a “potential buyer” lined up for City Hall, which is why this measure passed on a 5-2 council vote. City Council in March authorized a letter of intent to sell the campus to Artspace Projects Inc. for repurposing as live-work space for low-income artists.
But the nonprofit developer has not yet signed off on the agreement nor have city officials shared what price, if anything, the city will get for this prime piece of real estate.
We have heard the arguments that City Hall needs a supposed $5.7 million in repairs and that’s why Dearborn needs a new City Hall. But that is nonsense. Like classic cars, you can restore a building and indeed make it better. Even more efficient. The new building supposedly is three times less costly to operate? Says who?
Does Artspace have the funding to fix the building or is the city simply giving the building away?
If the city really is working to trim its workforce and operate with fewer people does it really need more space, which is one of the key arguments to justify the purchase of a new building. We think not. Yet, city leaders argued that the current City Hall – 95,000 square feet of it – has wasted space, such as the sweeping circle staircase in the center of the main City Hall building. Most people, including Artspace, would call that staircase a great design. So, too, about City Hall’s wide hallways.
They don’t make buildings like our City Hall any longer because it would cost too much to duplicate it. It is easier to build cheap buildings, such as one the city plans to purchase.
Just two council members opposed the purchase plan. Council President Tom Tafelksi and Councilman Brian O’Donnell.
“We’re saying we’re broke,” Tafelski said. “We can’t open up pools. Our neighborhoods have grass that’s nine and ten and twelve inches. Our legacy should not be in bricks and mortar. It should be in preserving and protecting the neighborhoods and fundamentally changing the downtown districts.”
Do our elected officials even have a plan to resuscitate our ailing city?