One Building down in West Dearborn, Two to Go

Giuliano's before . . .

Fakhoury says ‘will remove all buildings as soon as I can.’

One of three dilapidated buildings in the west Dearborn downtown district has finally come down but the city-imposed deadline to remove the other two buildings by week’s end will not be met.

Back in September, Dearborn City Council passed a resolution that by Dec. 16 (this Friday) the former Giuliano’s restaurant, Brother’s Tuxedo and Bally’s Vic Tanny would all be razed.

The buildings, all located between Mason and Military on Michigan Avenue, needed to be removed as the properties were part of a large-scale redevelopment proposed in 2005 by Dearborn developer Hakim Fakhoury.

As part of the agreement with the city and a way to save demolition costs, the foundations for each of the buildings could remain until the property was ready to be developed. So the Giuliano’s restaurant (only half of the building has been standing for several years now) was removed but the foundation remains.

. . . and after.

It isn’t clear what will happen next but Fakhoury’s request to city council for an extension to remove the buildings was denied.

Fakhoury tells Deepsaidwhat that he agreement that was signed only “contemplated” dates in which to remove the buildings.

“No one knows how much work it is to raze these buildings and the effort it entails,” Fakhoury said. “These date are arbitrary dates and should not be used as an excuse to inflict more financial damage to me more than I have already bared. I am moving at my financial pace and will remove all buildings as soon as I can. If the city seeks to use this as a reason to try to destroy me than I would of course I would have to protect myself by filing an action against them. We are living in very tough times and I am like many am only trying to survive them.

“I still feel very strongly that the request by the city to remove the buildings is not going to make downtown west Dearborn more appealing,” Fakhoury continued. “The intent has been to find a J/V partner who would invest in DVP (Dearborn Village Partners) and move the project forward which of course would include in removing the buildings at his expense not mine. I have spent much time and money to secure the tax credit that would be used to redevelop much of west Dearborn. These credits have become extinct and will be very valuable when the economy changes. DVP will have the ability through a financially strong J/V partner to amend the brownfield plan to even incorporate more west Dearborn buildings. I hope the city takes all this into account before they try to destroy me again and DVP.”

The tax credit Fakhoury mentions is on a state brownfield tax credit valued at $9.1 million and state and local tax capture worth $46 million. Regular readers of Deepsaidwhat.com will recall the story we wrote when the state of Michigan in December 2007 made a press announcement about the large-scale development planned in downtown. Here is what the state had to say:

Dearborn Village PartnersA state brownfield tax credit valued at $9.1 million and state and local tax capture worth $46 million will support a multi-phased mixed-use development across 12 sites along Michigan Ave. between Howard and Military streets in Dearborn. The project will completely renovate one city block in the city’s downtown and involve the construction of mixed-use retail and housing, including two 10-story mid-rise condos and a tri-level 881-space parking deck. The project is expected to generate $125 million in capital investment and create 350 new jobs.The West Dearborn Downtown Development Authority is assisting the project with $42.5 million in tax capture for public infrastructure activities.

Clearly, in this economy that development is simply a bridge too far. Dearborn city officials must now decide whether to remove the buildings on the city’s dime and then put a lien on each of the properties for the costs, which would be repaid if and when the property was developed, or let the buildings rot the downtown.

While taking action to remove the buildings would likely be a source of contention among some residents, it would go a long way to improving the look of the downtown. No one can deny that the removal of the Quality Inn at the corner of Michigan and Brady has done wonders to improve the look of that corner. Doing the same along Michigan Avenue to Fakhoury’s two buildings would have the same visual impact.

Having a clean canvas of land can go a long way to helping other potential developers dream about what could be built on each of these parcels of land.

DeepSaidWhat.com welcomes your views and encourages lively -- but civil -- discussions. Comments are unedited, but submissions reported as abusive may be removed.

5 Responses to “One Building down in West Dearborn, Two to Go”

  1. CityturningtoSHIT says:

    About time! Wasn’t the Brothers Tuxedo Building Condemned when purchased over 7 years ago?
    Did anyone else hear about Former Ms. America from Dearborn getting a DUI, while driving Fakoury’s Wife’s Car?

  2. Tdogg says:

    Shocked . . . just shocked! That once again, fakeHurry walks away from his obligations. Whether its demolition, taxes, redevelopment, leasing . . . you can see why the administration sticks with their preferred developer. Cause, “he’s just like them.” And by that I mean he blames everyone else, and never accepts responsibility.

    I’m looking forward to January, and seeing how many inches of the Free Press special edition – delinquent tax payers- he takes up. I’m bettin over a foot of very small font. Makes me smile when I write my check for the winter taxes.

    Robert Moses, the great developer, once said that New York didn’t need any more vision, they had too much of that, what was needed was elbow grease. Hakim, go pick up a jackhammer, and get to work. Your yammering is just noise at this point. Get something done.

  3. Tdogg says:

    I’m sorry, but after re-reading FH comments . . . “I am moving at my financial pace . . . no one knows how much work it is . . . I would have to protect myself by filing an action against them” I am infuriated.

    The only person who compares to him in hubris is Turkia Mullin, with her little lawsuit to reclaim her reputation (and big bags of money.) How is it that a guy can enter into a series of contracts, not get anything done, leave the City in such a ruined state, AND THREATEN TO SUE?!

    He obviously has no shame, and no concept of how the citizens of Dearborn despise him and his so-called efforts.

    If it weren’t for the absolutely terrible record of the so-called Law Department, I’d say let him go to court, we’ll tear his case apart.

  4. Saab says:

    Tdogg your right on the money. Hakim plays Bluto and the Council like violins, and they keep asking for more by granting extensions over and over. The Council should show some balls, because we know O’Reilly won’t and simply slap Hakim over and over, until he does comply or stick him like he has stuck the taxpayers over and over. Hakim knows he intimidates O’Reilly and the Council (excluding Suzanne, and Bazzy), because he feels, and it seems rightly so that they can’t stand up to him. Bring this prik down to his knees, and get business-people who stand by their word, and will do what they and the City agree on, whatever it may be. Its called balls Bluto use them for a change.

  5. Wanting Better for Dearborn says:

    What does Hakim have on this City that they continue to give him extensions? Maybe part of Dearborn lack of tax revenue is because Hakim doesn’t pay his! Time for a new Mayor and a whole new council so we can move this City forward instead of playing favorites and secret deals.